Think Small

We are living through a strange moment in the development of artificial intelligence. On one hand, the demos are dazzling: agents that seem to plan and reason with ease, models that compose original songs from a text prompt, and research tools that produce detailed reports in minutes. On the other hand, many AI teams are stuck in what is often called โ€œprototype purgatoryโ€, the stage where projects that look impressive on paper fail to become reliable systems that create real value for the organization.

The data supports this. Most enterprise GenAI initiatives fail to deliver measurable business impact. The problem is not the power of the models but a learning gap: generic tools that cannot adapt to complex organizational work environments. It is similar to what I have seen in industrial analytics, where the core problem is not the algorithm but the underlying complexity of the environment it has to operate in.

The difficulty grows when you build agent-based AI systems. These systems are often seen as a โ€œblack boxโ€. They are hard to debug, and their performance degrades unpredictably when they are integrated with specialized enterprise tools. They lack memory, struggle to generalize, and fail not because the AI โ€œisnโ€™t smartโ€ but because the system around it is fragile. The challenge has shifted from writing prompts to building robust, verifiable systems.

What makes this especially frustrating is the existence of a โ€œshadow AI economyโ€: employees using personal ChatGPT accounts to get their work done. It shows that demand for AI is real and tangible, but the large, ambitious solutions organizations are building simply do not meet it.

The strategic power of starting small

Given these difficulties, the most effective path forward may be the counterintuitive one. Instead of building broad, complex systems, AI teams should narrow their focus dramatically. In other words: think small. Much smaller.

This is where the idea of a wedge comes in: a deliberately narrow starting point that gives you something solid to build on.

A wedge is a highly focused initial solution that solves one painful, important problem for a single user or a small team, and does it exceptionally well. The idea is to build a standalone tool so useful that one person adopts it immediately, without needing organization-wide approval.

The critical ingredient is not just finding a small problem but finding the right person. Some call them change agents, the โ€œtent-raisersโ€: influential employees who are empowered to step outside standard procedures to solve problems themselves.

For example, a sales operations manager who spends half a day cleaning lead data, or a customer support manager who manually triages every request. They are the hidden AI economy, already using consumer tools because the official solutions are not good enough. Build for them first.

This approach suits AI especially well because it addresses the root of the trust problem. A wedge solution creates a tight feedback loop with a small group of users, making it possible to build reliability and improve the system in a controlled environment. It solves not only the cold-start problem of a user network but also the problem of building trust in AI systems inside the organization.

From a system that records to a system that acts

AI teams also need to understand the deep shift enterprise software is going through. For decades, the goal was to be the โ€œSystem of Recordโ€: the central database where critical information lives, such as Salesforce or SAP.

But AI has changed the battlefield. The real prize today is to become a โ€œSystem of Actionโ€: an intelligence layer that actually does the work, not only storing data but automating the workflow itself.

The most powerful way to build this is a โ€œData Trojan Horseโ€ strategy. You create an application that delivers immediate value and, in the process, captures a unique stream of proprietary data. This creates a positive growth loop: the tool delivers value, using it generates data, the data trains the AI, and the improved product becomes indispensable. Your moat is built not through a stronger model but through workflow-specific intelligence that accumulates over time.

A concrete example: the โ€œmessy inboxโ€ problem.

Every organization has processes that start with a chaotic stream of unstructured information: emails, PDF files, voice messages. An AI tool that automatically decodes, sorts and routes this information creates immediate value.

Once you own this critical upstream step, you earn the right to manage everything that happens after it. You are not competing with an information system; you are tapping into its data stream and becoming the new operational center.

We are living through a strange moment in the development of artificial intelligence. On one hand, the demos are dazzling: agents that seem to plan and reason with ease, models that compose original songs from a text prompt, and research tools that produce detailed reports in minutes. On the other hand, many AI teams are stuck in what is often called โ€œprototype purgatoryโ€, the stage where projects that look impressive on paper fail to become reliable systems that create real value for the organization.

The data supports this. Most enterprise GenAI initiatives fail to deliver measurable business impact. The problem is not the power of the models but a learning gap: generic tools that cannot adapt to complex organizational work environments. It is similar to what I have seen in industrial analytics, where the core problem is not the algorithm but the underlying complexity of the environment it has to operate in.

The difficulty grows when you build agent-based AI systems. These systems are often seen as a โ€œblack boxโ€. They are hard to debug, and their performance degrades unpredictably when they are integrated with specialized enterprise tools. They lack memory, struggle to generalize, and fail not because the AI โ€œisnโ€™t smartโ€ but because the system around it is fragile. The challenge has shifted from writing prompts to building robust, verifiable systems.

What makes this especially frustrating is the existence of a โ€œshadow AI economyโ€: employees using personal ChatGPT accounts to get their work done. It shows that demand for AI is real and tangible, but the large, ambitious solutions organizations are building simply do not meet it.

The strategic power of starting small

Given these difficulties, the most effective path forward may be the counterintuitive one. Instead of building broad, complex systems, AI teams should narrow their focus dramatically. In other words: think small. Much smaller.

This is where the idea of a wedge comes in: a deliberately narrow starting point that gives you something solid to build on.

A wedge is a highly focused initial solution that solves one painful, important problem for a single user or a small team, and does it exceptionally well. The idea is to build a standalone tool so useful that one person adopts it immediately, without needing organization-wide approval.

The critical ingredient is not just finding a small problem but finding the right person. Some call them change agents, the โ€œtent-raisersโ€: influential employees who are empowered to step outside standard procedures to solve problems themselves.

For example, a sales operations manager who spends half a day cleaning lead data, or a customer support manager who manually triages every request. They are the hidden AI economy, already using consumer tools because the official solutions are not good enough. Build for them first.

This approach suits AI especially well because it addresses the root of the trust problem. A wedge solution creates a tight feedback loop with a small group of users, making it possible to build reliability and improve the system in a controlled environment. It solves not only the cold-start problem of a user network but also the problem of building trust in AI systems inside the organization.

From a system that records to a system that acts

AI teams also need to understand the deep shift enterprise software is going through. For decades, the goal was to be the โ€œSystem of Recordโ€: the central database where critical information lives, such as Salesforce or SAP.

But AI has changed the battlefield. The real prize today is to become a โ€œSystem of Actionโ€: an intelligence layer that actually does the work, not only storing data but automating the workflow itself.

The most powerful way to build this is a โ€œData Trojan Horseโ€ strategy. You create an application that delivers immediate value and, in the process, captures a unique stream of proprietary data. This creates a positive growth loop: the tool delivers value, using it generates data, the data trains the AI, and the improved product becomes indispensable. Your moat is built not through a stronger model but through workflow-specific intelligence that accumulates over time.

A concrete example: the โ€œmessy inboxโ€ problem.

Every organization has processes that start with a chaotic stream of unstructured information: emails, PDF files, voice messages. An AI tool that automatically decodes, sorts and routes this information creates immediate value.

Once you own this critical upstream step, you earn the right to manage everything that happens after it. You are not competing with an information system; you are tapping into its data stream and becoming the new operational center.

Building for the long term

The way out of prototype purgatory and into a real system runs through strategic focus. But be careful: the large platform vendors are increasingly building โ€œgood enoughโ€ capabilities into their own products. That is why your AI tool has to be more than a wrapper around an API. It needs to capture unique data and integrate deeply into workflows to create a real layer of value.

With a wedge strategy, you can gain a first foothold to expand from. In the age of AI, the strongest wedges are the ones that capture proprietary data while delivering immediate value, so the solution becomes an essential system of action.

Key principles:

  • Start with one person. Before you build a complex system, create a tool that delivers immediate value to one person.

  • Target change agents. Find influential employees who are already using AI โ€œunder the radarโ€. They will lead the change.

  • Find your โ€œmessy inboxโ€. Locate the painful bottleneck of manual data entry. That is where your wedge is.

  • Design for a growth loop. Make sure every daily use generates data that improves your AIโ€™s performance.

  • Become a system of action. Donโ€™t stop at analyzing data. Do the actual work and own the workflow.

  • Choose reliability over capability. A simple, reliable tool that solves one problem well builds more trust than a clever but fragile system.

The teams that succeed will not be the ones chasing the most advanced models. They will be the ones that start with a single change agentโ€™s problem, capture unique data through a focused tool, and expand steadily from there. At a time when employees are already โ€œvoting with their feetโ€ and using personal ChatGPT accounts, the opportunity is not to build the perfect AI platform. It is to solve one real problem so well that everything else follows.

From the field: one working capability at a time

We apply the same principle at program scale. In a multi-stream AI program for a global manufacturer of advanced industrial equipment, the first phase delivers exactly one working capability per area โ€“ developer quality assurance, customer-support troubleshooting and product configuration โ€“ on real users and real data, not on synthetic examples.

Each capability starts narrow: a defined set of ticket types, a defined developer workflow, a limited configuration dataset. It expands only when the evidence supports it, against a baseline agreed in advance. Thinking small here is not a lack of ambition. It is how the program earns the right to scale.

Read the full case study: Three AI Capabilities, One Backbone

Further reading: AI That Earns the Right to Scale ยท Why 95% of Generative AI Pilots Fail?

Building for the long term

The way out of prototype purgatory and into a real system runs through strategic focus. But be careful: the large platform vendors are increasingly building โ€œgood enoughโ€ capabilities into their own products. That is why your AI tool has to be more than a wrapper around an API. It needs to capture unique data and integrate deeply into workflows to create a real layer of value.

With a wedge strategy, you can gain a first foothold to expand from. In the age of AI, the strongest wedges are the ones that capture proprietary data while delivering immediate value, so the solution becomes an essential system of action.

Key principles:

  • Start with one person. Before you build a complex system, create a tool that delivers immediate value to one person.

  • Target change agents. Find influential employees who are already using AI โ€œunder the radarโ€. They will lead the change.

  • Find your โ€œmessy inboxโ€. Locate the painful bottleneck of manual data entry. That is where your wedge is.

  • Design for a growth loop. Make sure every daily use generates data that improves your AIโ€™s performance.

  • Become a system of action. Donโ€™t stop at analyzing data. Do the actual work and own the workflow.

  • Choose reliability over capability. A simple, reliable tool that solves one problem well builds more trust than a clever but fragile system.

The teams that succeed will not be the ones chasing the most advanced models. They will be the ones that start with a single change agentโ€™s problem, capture unique data through a focused tool, and expand steadily from there. At a time when employees are already โ€œvoting with their feetโ€ and using personal ChatGPT accounts, the opportunity is not to build the perfect AI platform. It is to solve one real problem so well that everything else follows.

From the field: one working capability at a time

We apply the same principle at program scale. In a multi-stream AI program for a global manufacturer of advanced industrial equipment, the first phase delivers exactly one working capability per area โ€“ developer quality assurance, customer-support troubleshooting and product configuration โ€“ on real users and real data, not on synthetic examples.

Each capability starts narrow: a defined set of ticket types, a defined developer workflow, a limited configuration dataset. It expands only when the evidence supports it, against a baseline agreed in advance. Thinking small here is not a lack of ambition. It is how the program earns the right to scale.

Read the full case study: Three AI Capabilities, One Backbone

Further reading: AI That Earns the Right to Scale ยท Why 95% of Generative AI Pilots Fail?

Ready for evolution?

Ready for evolution?

Ready for evolution?

office@dataraven.tech

+972-054-5040191

HaTchya 14, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6816916, Israel

Home

About

Industry

Municipal Authorities

Information Systems

Contact

Articles

All rights reserved to Data Raven Technologies

office@dataraven.tech

+972-054-5040191

Ben Avigdor 18, Tel Aviv, 6721842

Industry

Local Authorities

Information Systems

Contact

All rights reserved to Data Raven Technologies

office@dataraven.tech

+972-054-5040191

Ben Avigdor 18, Tel Aviv, 6721842

Home

About

Industry

Local Authorities

Information Systems

Contact

All rights reserved to Data Raven Technologies

Contact Us

Local Authorities

Industry

About

Home